![]() Charles River, Needham. © 2003 Marsha C. Salett |
Originally, the theme of this Spring 2003 Conservation Perspectives was freshwater rivers and lakes. When I received the articles, it quickly became apparent that all three authors expanded the topic to that of watershed protection. Collectively, Lou Wagner in his article about the Ipswich River watershed, Karlene Schwartz in her article about Squam Lakes, and Nina Danforth in her stories about the Neponset and Hoosic River watersheds, touch on many issues: instream flow, water withdrawal, stormwater flows, interbasin transfers, sewage and wastewater, water quality, aquatic plant communities, invasive species, fish habitat, fish kills, anadromous fish spawning grounds, dams, as well as recreational and aesthetic values. Interconnected, these issues form an environmental gathering ground of a watershed and contribute to its health or degradation.
Independently of one another, Wagner, Schwartz and Danforth intertwined a second theme into their watershed articles the theme of advocacy and activism. Humans have lived by and utilized and changed the natural waterways of our country for centuries. Our activities have direct and often lasting -- consequences on watersheds and the organisms dependent on them. Today, watershed protection usually involves undoing past damages and fighting for good management practices through educating citizens and government officials, lobbying for funds and policy change, and direct participation in hands on activities from monitoring invasive species to removing trash from the water. The authors demonstrated in their articles that when stakeholders join forces, they become a whole gathering ground of involved people who affect positive change in their watersheds.
Despite progress to date in the Ipswich, Neponset, and Hoosic Rivers and in the Squam Lakes, future success is far from assured. Budget cuts can kill or indefinitely stall the most worthwhile conservation programs and environmental improvements. In Massachusetts, the Romney administration has already axed the Watershed Initiative program. (My friends in education and health and human services are complaining of devastating cuts in their programs, too.)
![]() Walden Pond ©2003 Marsha C. Salett |
What do we as conservationists, scientists, naturalists, and educators do in these difficult times? Lou Wagner wrote that the combination of advocacy and science is an effective model and tool for watershed restoration. This combination is a powerful tool in other areas of conservation biology and environmental protection as well. Along with advocacy and science, Id like to propose a third aspect activism.
Environmental activism is already a major part of the professional lives and personal avocations of many of Conservation Perspectives readers. However, in todays economic reality, government agencies and non-profit organizations alike are underfunded, with little respite from budget woes in sight. Increased volunteerism is one of the most effective ways to maintain public awareness of environmental issues and to preserve and protect our valuable natural resources and special places:As you read the examples of advocacy and activism in this issue of Conservation Perspectives, I hope that you will be similarly inspired to participate in an environmental cause that is important to you. Locally or globally, environmental protection and conservation depend upon a whole gathering ground of vocal and active supporters.
The views and opinions expressed in all articles that appear in "Conservation Perspectives" are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of NESCB.